lyrics
His iconoclastic view of form
veridical, diacritical, semantic...Nom de plume, like taxonomy, always ready for it's norm.
Mephitic, escape the room, all the gloom behind you.
Sybaritic– catharsis, heartless art is antipruritic.
Amassed apiece of dust and storm.
(x3)
And as if to misinform, with the need to conform on public platform, he'd scream: “This Theater of Absurd must epitomize what word it satirizes, for it ponders in modern times while it makes fun of what makes it inherent”. What a Keen observation. Inherence is a plight, but to be is to be perceived? Lavished in time’s provoking shadow as emotions project and participate like light.
But...it's adding epicycles to transduction, he must escape this self-destruct with thinking of things-in-themselves.
(His iconoclastic view of form
veridical, diacritical, semantic...Nom de plume, like taxonomy, always ready for it's norm.
Mephitic, escape the room, all the gloom behind you.
Sybaritic– catharsis, heartless art is antipruritic.
Amassed apiece of dust and storm.)
For form cannot exist without matter,but to actualize is to form matter. Does form matter if not eternal? Does form need chronology? Does eternal form exist as a higher reality if idealism is opposing reality but at the same time being defined and formed as a concept in reality? If everything is composite of matter and form, how does form actualize matter? But of everything existing in bimodality, how do we experience, and that of multistable perception by proprioception or exteroception, if perception needs an observer? Assuming an observer needs something to react to actualize it, where does that something generate but from nothing which doesn't exist conceptually in itself. If form doesn't exist in itself without matter, without experience, how does one form form without inquiry of what form is? Even taxonomy makes form informal; how does solution rise of paradox, how is the pursuit of knowledge not perfectly pursued, whether not to mention what mode ranges from moral? And to form accidentally? If form is contingent, how is it possibly property without proposition? How does property only exist in speech if each is of reality? It’s process philosophy. I ask this all rhetorically.
credits
license
all rights reserved